then reproduce my letter of opinion in newspapers this week.
Do not amagaré: supporting the strike of judges. Moreover, if the lawyers did, also would.
judges have the right to strike? It seems that our Minister of Justice, which has been typing in "mouflon" with Garzon, an example of factual examples of suspicion that we have used "left", not like a lot. He thinks that it is not talking about whether the judges and judges have this right or not, but you do strike, "would have betrayed their mandate with the public." At school it was called antithesis, and betrayal better not talk, Mr. hunter.
certainly do not think the judges recognized this right to strike so that the constitution recognizes, for the simple reason that it is a state power, but what is clear is that judges can not cope with their work but have the necessary elements, mainly people ready at your fingertips, and the appropriate technological resources. The primary reason
determining the cause of the strike, make no mistake, it lies in the requests for reconciling work and family life, or FITNESS their remuneration, among others, but the controversy arose regarding the case Mari Luz, which is a sign of the henhouse Justice English.
In a state where access to the judiciary is disastrous both for time and for quality control of the processes is non-existent and where, for example, according to the sites, evictions stretched in time for more than two years, joined all the population growth, crime and insolvency on people, determining necessary changes in the legal system in a position to do justice.
It is unacceptable that citizens with a finger mark to blame the Judges, should not be forgotten are the judge and tried to execute what resources they have. Even blame the officials for a court, would make more sense if the legal system ensure that sufficient preparation to staff who have not taught deadlines. Let everyone know that, "said President of Catalonia TSJ, Ms.. Alegret, "the court may only require 100% women's selection if sufficient resources, if they are in the best conditions to work, if there is budget, and if it's selected offers ability to choose your staff collaborator . Judge not ordered, the judge does what it does to give it.
I am very clear that the blame for any injustice corresponds to the state for not providing resources to the Judiciary, and therefore which should answer that is dedicated to hunting twice in the company of a suspect, or what lengthens the time a city court in Tarragona, since the year 2003.
judges have the right to strike? It seems that our Minister of Justice, which has been typing in "mouflon" with Garzon, an example of factual examples of suspicion that we have used "left", not like a lot. He thinks that it is not talking about whether the judges and judges have this right or not, but you do strike, "would have betrayed their mandate with the public." At school it was called antithesis, and betrayal better not talk, Mr. hunter.
certainly do not think the judges recognized this right to strike so that the constitution recognizes, for the simple reason that it is a state power, but what is clear is that judges can not cope with their work but have the necessary elements, mainly people ready at your fingertips, and the appropriate technological resources. The primary reason
determining the cause of the strike, make no mistake, it lies in the requests for reconciling work and family life, or FITNESS their remuneration, among others, but the controversy arose regarding the case Mari Luz, which is a sign of the henhouse Justice English.
In a state where access to the judiciary is disastrous both for time and for quality control of the processes is non-existent and where, for example, according to the sites, evictions stretched in time for more than two years, joined all the population growth, crime and insolvency on people, determining necessary changes in the legal system in a position to do justice.
It is unacceptable that citizens with a finger mark to blame the Judges, should not be forgotten are the judge and tried to execute what resources they have. Even blame the officials for a court, would make more sense if the legal system ensure that sufficient preparation to staff who have not taught deadlines. Let everyone know that, "said President of Catalonia TSJ, Ms.. Alegret, "the court may only require 100% women's selection if sufficient resources, if they are in the best conditions to work, if there is budget, and if it's selected offers ability to choose your staff collaborator . Judge not ordered, the judge does what it does to give it.
I am very clear that the blame for any injustice corresponds to the state for not providing resources to the Judiciary, and therefore which should answer that is dedicated to hunting twice in the company of a suspect, or what lengthens the time a city court in Tarragona, since the year 2003.
* Minister of Justice Mr. Bermejo.
