The unborn child, ie, those conceived but not born, which is located in the belly mother's birth until the woman is the protected legal right that the Constitutional Court stated in its 1985 ruling, a legal right protected those who for reasons of "social" that are part of the ideology PSOE again brought to the fore to feed any controversy in his favor, and knows that both use. Son reasons given To ensure "legal certainty and equity for women and doctors to avoid regional differences in law enforcement as the Autonomous Community where they live, a reason that no two fingers to the forehead can believe.
Attempts to temporarily hide some of the appalling economic and social data, ie, weaving a new smokescreen of this socialist government, it seems that, after attempts in 1994 and 2004 (with the PSOE in power ) under the Ministry of Equality for the occasion and created some more now that if this practice will take place in times of crisis, people granted the ability to adapt the deplorable economic and social situation, not offering them resources and expanding their coverage at work, but allowing women to ascend children murdered for the simple reason you can not afford diapers.
Thus, the Minister for Equality Ms. Bibiana Aidoo, has come to say that if mothers have the right to give birth, are entitled to choose not to do so, but interestingly, does not explain anything about that 97% of cases of abortion in Spain are not for cases of sexual assault or serious illness in the fetus, but by disease (disorder) in the mother, an absolutely incredible situation in Europe. All this leads me
absolute surprise to the point of having de sentir que el tema de l’abortament és utilitzat per l’Esglèsia per a fer Política. Jo voldria assenyalar que l’Esglèsia a aquest país no fa Política, no sols perquè ni li deixen ni pot fer-la, sino perquè el que únicament fa és defensar els seus principis: la vida humana, que és la base de la Religió catòlica cristiana. Si perquè l’Esglèsia estigui defensant el seu principi i valor fonamental se’n diu que està adoptant una política en contra del Govern, llavors jo aquí ara dic que el Sr. Zapatero fa la Religió Política o Política Religiosa d’enfonsar l’Esglèsia sigui com sigui.
Attempts to temporarily hide some of the appalling economic and social data, ie, weaving a new smokescreen of this socialist government, it seems that, after attempts in 1994 and 2004 (with the PSOE in power ) under the Ministry of Equality for the occasion and created some more now that if this practice will take place in times of crisis, people granted the ability to adapt the deplorable economic and social situation, not offering them resources and expanding their coverage at work, but allowing women to ascend children murdered for the simple reason you can not afford diapers.
Thus, the Minister for Equality Ms. Bibiana Aidoo, has come to say that if mothers have the right to give birth, are entitled to choose not to do so, but interestingly, does not explain anything about that 97% of cases of abortion in Spain are not for cases of sexual assault or serious illness in the fetus, but by disease (disorder) in the mother, an absolutely incredible situation in Europe. All this leads me
absolute surprise to the point of having de sentir que el tema de l’abortament és utilitzat per l’Esglèsia per a fer Política. Jo voldria assenyalar que l’Esglèsia a aquest país no fa Política, no sols perquè ni li deixen ni pot fer-la, sino perquè el que únicament fa és defensar els seus principis: la vida humana, que és la base de la Religió catòlica cristiana. Si perquè l’Esglèsia estigui defensant el seu principi i valor fonamental se’n diu que està adoptant una política en contra del Govern, llavors jo aquí ara dic que el Sr. Zapatero fa la Religió Política o Política Religiosa d’enfonsar l’Esglèsia sigui com sigui.
El mateix happens with the Secretary of the PSOE Organization Mrs. Leire Pajín who said that the Church "confuses religion with politics" and that in any case "decisions are taken about the laws in Congress." This question allows us to immerse ourselves in the familiar terrain of evil of our socialist government intervention: it is to regulate everything, as it is, and ordered to intervene in the lives of individuals who are building democracy adopted by both famous English progressivism. It is an intervention that would define as "positive": intervening in people granted them absolute freedom to leave the state in guanyant, an aspect of confondre S'ha mai amb pel the propugnat libéralisme PP.
0 comments:
Post a Comment